|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
BUS USERS UK Annual Report 2009
Chairman’s Report Bus Users UK readily accepted the appointment of Passenger Focus as ‘bus passengers’ champion’ for England, recognising the expertise that Passenger Focus had already gained from its work with rail passengers, which puts it in a strong position to produce the evidence-based work on bus passenger satisfaction that its new role requires. From the start Bus Users UK has indicated its willingness to work with Passenger Focus, providing information at ground level that will complement its own findings. We meet regularly with senior staff at Passenger Focus and I sit on the Passenger Focus Bus Stakeholder Board, with representatives of bus operators, the Department for Transport, local authorities, the Traffic Commissioners, and London TravelWatch. This body discusses and advises on the work that is planned and has been undertaken. The Department for Transport has asked us to continue the bus complaints role through the Bus Appeals Body (BAB). This body was set up by Caroline Cahm in conjunction with the Confederation of Passenger Transport and considers complaints about bus services where the complainant is unhappy with the way their complaint has been handled. During 2009 we have undertaken a complete overhaul of our complaint-handling procedures and the establishment of a tracking system that allows us to keep a much more effective eye on the progress of complaints. In addition to the complaints that are passed to us for possible reference to BAB, many general bus service complaints come into our offices and Bus Users UK staff provide a valuable service in helping bus passengers to deal with these properly, helped by our accumulated knowledge of the bus industry. The surgeries programme is another important plank in the work of Bus Users UK, providing an opportunity for bus passengers to discuss their suggestions and grievances with representatives of bus operators and local authorities. Bus operators tell us that they regard this as a valuable source of market information, and appreciate the chance to listen to the comments of passengers and explain the bus company’s point of view. Even complaints and grumbles provide invaluable market research, though there is positive feedback through surgeries too. The quality audit facility that we provide has been taken up by more companies and it is interesting to note that many of these are already among the best-regarded operators in the country. It is encouraging that even the best operators are not content to rest on their laurels and pretend that there is nothing to learn from mystery passengers sampling their services at all times and in all weathers. We have been fortunate that bus operators have appreciated the work that Bus Users UK has done and have continued to be willing to fund us. With a membership of around 700, the income from our individual members could never fund the useful work that we do, and in the absence of funding from the Department for Transport, which has repeatedly indicated to us that it is happy that the bus industry should continue to be our main source of funds, we will continue to look for support from bus operators. We are fortunate that the Welsh Assembly Government provides funding for our Welsh activities and the Scottish Government provides some funding for audit and advisory work representing bus passengers in Scotland. During the year we had some changes of staff and their responsibilities. Sylvia Lunn, our membership administrator at Shepperton, retired, and we were grateful for her hard work on our behalf. Following the reorganisation of our complaint-handling procedures, Chris Dale retired as complaints officer; Chris performed a valuable service on behalf of bus passengers, using his extensive knowledge of bus services around the country, and we thank him for his hard work. Julian Osborne has taken on the complaints role, in addition to his involvement in a wide range of other matters, including his invaluable human resources advice. With a small staff, everybody is expected to turn their hand to a wide range of tasks, and they have done this willingly and enthusiastically. I must pay tribute to the ‘English’ staff — Phil Tonks and Sue Dawson; the team in Wales — Margaret Everson, Barclay Davies and Bethan Davies; Stephen Morris, who handles external affairs and produces our much-praised Bus User magazine; our faithful long-serving treasurer, Stephen Le Bras; and of course our life president, Caroline Cahm, who is taking a well-deserved back seat but is always available for advice and support. With a complement of just 10 people, some full-time, but more of them part-time, we achieve a great deal. They work long hours to provide bus passengers with a proper voice and I hope that with Passenger Focus fully up and running by April 2010 and continued funding for the important work we do, we can continue to develop the work that Caroline pioneered a quarter of a century ago.Gavin Booth
BUS USERS UK representation on other bodies BUS USERS UK Cymru is regularly represented at strategic meetings of: UK Bus Awards External Affairs We have of course been involved in consultation on how Passenger Focus’s role should be defined in the lead-up to them taking on this role officially from 1 April 2010. Other consultations to which we have responded have been the EU proposals on passenger rights, which appeared so generous we might well have ended up with no buses over which to have rights, changes in aspects of concessionary free travel, the regulations surrounding Quality Contracts, the use of taxis and community transport on scheduled bus services and the future of Smartcards. We were also involved in the consultation as to whether bus industry ‘monopolies’ should be investigated by the Competition Commission. On more local levels, we also fed into the Oxford bus strategy, Surrey County Council’s review of bus services, whether Metrobus’s takeover of services in Horsham was in the public interest and Greater Manchester’s proposals for improved cross-city links and major public transport corridors. The involvement of our local contacts network has broadened the perspective we are able to bring to such consultations. As a result of other activity this year we were less pro-active in press contact than we would have liked, but we were asked to comment on a range of issues on BBC local and national radio (usually live interviews at unearthly hours of the morning!) and our External Affairs Officer even finished up defending London’s bendibuses on London Tonight. In line with requests at the AGM our magazine Bus User also picked up on a few London issues during the year.
Operations in England As well as our surgeries programme (see below), we continue to work at various levels with our local member contacts, who volunteer their time freely to meet with their local operators and authorities. They are also contributing to a project to gather information on journey reliability which gives us an interesting snapshot of how local bus services around the country are operating. I have been speaking at transport conferences and events to put across the user’s perspective and meeting with industry people who also help us to understand the challenges behind providing local bus services, as well as giving the industry an insight into the passenger’s side of things. I’ve also been meeting with politicians and attended a transport meeting at a party conference. Special events such as the Older People’s Forum in Stoke on Trent, organised by Sue Dawson, also provide a crucial insight into the challenges and experiences faced by specific sections of society. By meeting with Business Groups, we can help them to understand what might make a successful service, and they can tell us what might make their members use public transport more. I’ve also been involved on an ongoing basis with my local Hospital Trust to help them with information provision on existing services, and to help plan for new initiatives, in partnership with operators and the local authority. I am a volunteer every Sunday afternoon in my local hospital for this purpose. If anyone is interested in becoming a local volunteer contact, please contact Phil on phil@bususers.org or 01384 273267. Of course, we also continue to work with, and meet, the various established groups around the country, as well as giving help and advice for any potential new groups. BUS USERS UK Cymru
The more specific targets were largely met and exceeded in 2008/09, though 381 complaints handled fell just a little short of the target (the 384 quoted below is for the calendar year 2009). However in all the targets over which Bus Users UK Cymru has control were exceeded by some margin: 18 surgeries were organised (21 in the calendar year 2009) against a target of 12, once again giving excellent coverage of Wales (see ‘Surgeries’, below) while 22 strategic meetings were attended against a target of 10. Bus Users UK Cymru continues to have representation on a wide range of bodies which are detailed in Bus Users UK Cymru’s own very detailed annual report. It also continues to run a network of eight local representatives operating on an hourly-paid casual basis.
They are: Bus Users UK Cyrmu will shortly have its own website, on which you can see the full report, or write to the Cardiff office for a copy on CD-ROM.
Financial Report for 2009 So how does this affect Bus Users UK? Our income and expenditure is carefully monitored and every penny spent goes towards representing the passengers’ interests. I could quote a whole lot of figures but suffice to say that income and expenditure overall has remained much the same. However we could do more if our supporters in the bus industry could give us more. Luckily for all of us, Caroline Cahm’s overall prudent stewardship of the bank balances from Day One together with a most handsome bequest from a benefactor has kept us in the black. I should like to thank all our supporters among the membership and bus industry, including the Scottish Government and Welsh Assembly (British Government, please note!) and I hope that this support will continue. Finally, looking forward to 2010, I am mindful of the fact that we are working alongside the rail passengers’ champion in the form of Passenger Focus. I do not anticipate any major changes in the way that we collect income and pay out expenses; however, we have made a subtle change in that we have always been an unincorporated entity and it made sense to become a company limited by guarantee. Please note that cheques should still be payable to ‘Bus Users UK’. STEPHEN LE BRAS Handling complaints With improved tracking systems we are following complaints more effectively than before, and some of the major operators have responded well to a more rigorous regime. We have seen notable improvements in complaint handling from some of the main transport groups as a result of our more effective pursuance of complaints. The same system is giving us more useable data on which issues concern passengers and which operators are causing the most difficulties for passengers. Given that we handle less than 1,000 complaints on something like 2.5billion journeys we take the view that ‘naming and shaming’ is probably not appropriate, though the fact that the five major groups account for 79% of the complaints in England is probably no surprise, given their share of the market. The make-up of the Welsh bus market is rather different; only three of the five main groups are active in local bus services there and with more independent operators, three local-authority-owned operators (as there were in 2009) having a large market share in the most populous areas and the growth of Veolia, not one of the ‘big five’, in Wales they accounted for just over 60% of the complaints. In England the complaints by issue were as follows (some complainants will have complained about more than one issue): English complaints
In Wales we also handled a number of complaints regarding local authorities and other agencies, hence the total below showing less than the total number of complaints. The complaints against bus companies by issue were: Welsh complaints
Complaints, England & Wales
Surgeries 2009 During 2009 Bus Users UK undertook 46 surgeries throughout the country. Of these 21 were in Wales, 25 in England. We also attended Travelwatch South West’s surgery in Exeter and London Travelwatch’s first surgery in Croydon while the local branch in Oxford held a very well-attended forum to discuss Oxfordshire County Council’s controversial plans for Oxford’s bus services. In the West Midlands, we are working much more closely with Centro, and the operators on an extended version of our surgeries, called ‘Your Bus Matters’. These events add on an early morning ‘Meet The Manager’ session for commuters to have their say. The surgery itself then operates throughout the day and a Transport Users Forum allows another chance to air views in the evening. Meanwhile the last surgery of the year was held in conjunction with Passenger Focus. They are very interested in our surgery work and in a pilot scheme we held three surgeries over the 2009/10 winter to coincide with some of the areas in which they are undertaking customer satisfaction work. Passenger Focus is also getting involved in Your Bus Matters in the West Midlands and there will be further joint working with Passenger Focus on surgeries in 2010.Surgeries in England, 2009 Surgeries in Wales, 2009 In broad terms issues which concerned passengers at surgeries in England were as follows:
Very nearly 10% of all surgery attendees wanted improved services in the evenings and/or at weekends and 4.6% wanted higher frequencies. 1.75% thought their fares were too high. Just over 2% wanted to see drivers having more powers to throw people off the bus for antisocial behaviour. 2.6% asked for low-floor buses on their routes, and 1.2% had difficulty getting wheelchairs or pushchairs on to the bus, while another 1% referred to the difficulty of boarding buses around pushchairs already on the bus. Not surprisingly 8.4% of all surgery comments concerned late running or buses not turning up at all; early running was less of a common problem, though not insignificant. Bunching was more commonly raised however. On the other hand 6.5% of all surgery visitors were complimentary about reliability and almost 3% mentioned how friendly drivers were. However 3.4% said the opposite and 2% were unhappy with driving standards while 2.5% of people thought their buses were dirty or had too much litter on them. Commercial activities Nonetheless we completed a follow-up to last year’s work for Southern Vectis on the Isle of Wight, adding to it an audit of their publicity material, and we also audited one of Britain’s leading bus operators in the customer service stakes, Trentbarton. BUS USERS UK — who are we? We aim:
BUS USERS UK, PO Box 2950, Stoke on Trent ST4 9EW
President: Dr Caroline Cahm MBE PhD
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||